Categories: News

Fight Between The Adidas And Thom Browne – Who Won It?

Thom Browne was the target of an Adidas trademark infringement case that was dropped on Thursday. Adidas had claimed that Thom Browne had utilized its iconic “three stripes” insignia without its consent.

Facts of the Lawsuit

According to Bloomberg Law, the 8-teamed jury found in favor of Thom Browne after it was challenged by Adidas for $7.8 million in 2021 over allegations that it “imitate[d]” Adidas’ iconic three-stripe emblem and design.

The “Four-Bar Signature” ribbons pattern by Browne and the company’s “Grosgrain Signature”—a red, white, and blue line sequence of phases at the center of the lawsuit, as per CNN. Browne’s team claimed in legal papers that the Grosgrain Signature displayed five stripes, but Adidas defense attorneys claimed it only had three, as per CNN.

Essential Quote

Robert Maldonado, an attorney for Thom Browne, asserted during closing statements on Thursday that Adidas “does not own stripes.”

Important Horizons

The “Three-Bar Signature” is a three-striped pattern that the Browne brand started offering around 2005. As per CNN, which cited court records, once Adidas approached the business about the pattern roughly two years later Thom Browne agreed to refrain from using it. After then, in 2008 and 2009, the “Four-Bar Signature” appearance was made accessible. Adidas claimed that it wasn’t until Thom Browne applied to trademark the “Grosgrain Signature” in 2018 that it learned of the potential trademark infringement.

Thom Browne’s usage of stripes on sportswear, according to Adidas, was “likely to generate consumer misunderstanding and confuse the general public.” Since 1949, Adidas has sported its iconic three-stripe design. It has brought legal action against a number of other companies for alleged infringement of trademarks, notably Abercrombie & Fitch in 2005 and Forever 21 in 2017.

The Other Facts of the Lawsuit

The jurors decided for 3 hours during the trial’s brief one-week duration at Manhattan’s Southern District Court.

Adidas has been contacted by reporters for a response. According to a spokeswoman for the firm, it is “displeased with the ruling” and will “diligently defend” its copyrights moving forward.

The Verdict of the Case

On Thursday, a Manhattan jury ruled that Adidas AG (ADSGn.DE) had failed to establish that the use of stripes on garments by luxury retailer Thom Browne Inc. violated the sportswear giant’s distinctive three-stripe trademarks.

The trial, which started on January 3, was concluded by the jury’s conclusion that the clothing house’s parallel stripes patterns were not likely to encourage consumers to confuse them with Adidas’ goods. Among other things, Thom Browne had contended that the patterns have a different number of stripes.

So, Adidas lost its case brought against Thom Browne.

Sameer
Sameer is a writer, entrepreneur and investor. He is passionate about inspiring entrepreneurs and women in business, telling great startup stories, providing readers with actionable insights on startup fundraising, startup marketing and startup non-obviousnesses and generally ranting on things that he thinks should be ranting about all while hoping to impress upon them to bet on themselves (as entrepreneurs) and bet on others (as investors or potential board members or executives or managers) who are really betting on themselves but need the motivation of someone else’s endorsement to get there. Sameer is a writer, entrepreneur and investor. He is passionate about inspiring entrepreneurs and women in business, telling great startup stories, providing readers with actionable insights on startup fundraising, startup marketing and startup non-obviousnesses and generally ranting on things that he thinks should be ranting about all while hoping to impress upon them to bet on themselves (as entrepreneurs) and bet on others (as investors or potential board members or executives or managers) who are really betting on themselves but need the motivation of someone else’s endorsement to get there.

Recent Posts

The Cost of Silence: How Pharmaceutical Negligence Redefines Corporate Risk in 2026

In the current business landscape, brand trust is not merely an intangible asset; it is the bedrock of market valuation.…

3 hours ago

Online Engineering Degrees: Your Complete Guide to Flexible, Accredited Paths Into the Engineering Field

Engineering continues to be one of the most in-demand and respected career fields worldwide. As technology evolves and industries shift…

3 hours ago

How Melbourne Businesses Are Dominating Google Maps in 2026

Melbourne has become one of the most competitive cities in Australia for local search visibility. In 2026, the businesses pulling…

4 hours ago

Spades Card Game: The Perfect Blend of Challenge and Calm

Some games are exciting. Some are calming. But very few manage to be both at the same time. The spades…

22 hours ago

Finding Better Deals While Shopping Online

Finding good deals online is often framed as a race. The fastest shopper wins the discount, the flash sale, or…

23 hours ago

Why Original Content Matters in SEO and Marketing

You might have your content ready and all set to publish, but a common question is, “Will this really work?”…

23 hours ago